Talk:RAS syndrome

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RAS syndrome article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

no consensus, 20 June 2009, see discussion.
no consensus, 18 July 2008, see discussion.

Mention "Ambiguity" in the linguistic advocation

TODO phrase linguistically: in many contexts the "IP" might mean both Internet Protocol and Intellectual Property, so using "IP protocol" resolves the ambiguity potential. 147.161.250.196 (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DC comics is NOT a redundant acronym

No matter how many times it's reverted;

DC = company name

Comics = product they sell

So if you buy the latest issues of Superman and Batman you have bought the product of comics from the company Detective Comics 97.112.197.204 (talk) 14:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? 1976? –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:12, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please see archive 2 for 9 kjghpillion discussions about this, and how if you're the ip from before, you might want to give this a break consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely the same IP. Basically a WP:SPA and WP:STICK issue at this point. — Czello ^(music) 14:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

rpp time? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fucketh it, rpp time, we ball in hell consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has also been reported at WP:AIV and WP:AN/EW. — Chrisahn (talk) 14:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has been blocked for three months. — Chrisahn (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...but PP would probably be good anyway, since the disruptive user has used several other IP ranges in the past. — Chrisahn (talk) 15:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]